The Dream Coming To Fill The Void [Tran Duc Tri] The Month of The Image text source.
When photography first came into being, anxious to copy down reality, even the invention of photographic science – with its black and white tones, a product of chance and the limited photo-sensitive chemical techniques available at the time – showed that photography in itself was an unrealistic representation. The more it strives to copy reality, the more it distances itself from it, and has done so from the beginning.
One of humanity’s first photographs that remains preserved to the present day was that taken by Nicéphore Niépce (1765-1833) around 1826. An object as large and static as a house required an exposure of 8 hours to enable Niépce to fix the image onto the cliché-verre. The building is unmoving, but the ground spins. The light entering from both sides of the photo gives the impression of two suns existing simultaneously.
The development of science and of photographic art has allowed us to view things invisible to the naked eye, from the beating of a bee’s wings, to stars billions of light years away, to the form of the bacteria. Such things become comprehensible because photography transports us into a world of dreams, which do not exist in themselves, but which reflect the reality of a practical world devoid of poetic meaning. The artist makes material objects his own and creates works of art out of them, images to make up for this failing.
Artists have not waited until now, with digital photography in common usage, to take the ownership of objects and make them serve their dreams. Almost 100 years ago, Marcel Duchamp (1887-1968) created a scandal in New York’s artistic scene by attempting to display a urinal baptised “Fountain” at the Society of Independent Artists’ exhibition in 1917. The exhibition’s advertising was kept neutral, and it was supposed to accept all the works, but the organisers took the action of refusing “Fountain”, provoking general uproar amongst the Dadaists and Duchamp’s resignation from his position as a director of the Society of Independent Artists.
With “Fountain”, Duchamp modified art’s central role, which would no longer be the expression of the real, but its intellectual interpretation and he found his biggest supporters amongst those photographers. Later, “Fountain” would become available for public viewing thanks to Alfred Stieglitz (1864-1946)’s photograph, whose publication would be accompanied by an article extolling Duchamp’s inventive spirit. Following the example of the latter, Man Ray (1890-1976) would also begin to take random objects or create unreal objects and invent photographic processes in order to make images based on these objects, then present them as works of art. He stated: “My goal was never to fix my dreams, but to have the determination to realize them”.
Almost a century would pass between the chance photo taken by Niépce and Man Ray’s deliberate creation before photography would manage to escape its artisan form to become an art. In less than 20 years, modern digital methods have provided plastic artists with the best means for exploring that vague space between the abstract and the representation. As Man Ray underlined, “There has been no artistic progress, just as there has been none in the sexual domain. Art has quite simply found other means of expression.” Taking over readymade images or fabricating new images is no longer important in itself. What is important is the artist’s CHOICE and the DE CISION that he takes and the permanent existence of voids to fill with his dreams.
Eulogy To The Composed Image [Philippe Piguet] The Month of The Image text source.
The daguerreotype, the photogenic drawing, the direct positive, calotype, ambrotype, cliché-verre (glass print), etc., no sooner had photography appeared than it became the object of all kinds of technical and artistic research that allow it to be viewed as a form of expression in its own right. Thus, with the course of years, the usage of the most diverse materials: salted and albumen paper, gelatin-chloride silver prints, collodion, bromide, platinum, etc., has enabled artists to endow photography with an incredible production of varied images.
If, at first, photography developed out of artistic debates, devoting itself to the almost exclusive genres of portraiture and lanscapes, at the end the XIXth century, several transformations were taking place, especially with regards to the meaning of the image and the question of representation. The combined influences of impressionism, naturalism and symbolism contributed to inaugurate a photographic style, pictorialism, which shares similar concerns to the plastic art school and validated the connection between the beaux arts and photography.
This tendency, characterized especially by the use of warm and faded colors, turned towards the formal values of the image and this trend has been conveyed through the work of the Briton, Peter Henry, the French artist, Robert Demachy and the American, Edward Emerson. In response to emerging pictorial innovations represented by Fauvism, Fururism and Cubism, at the beginning of the XXth century, Alfred Stieglitz renewed the tendency within the group Photo-Secession and his renewals were vehicled by Camera Work, a Photo-Scessionist review. With the course of time, concerns about construction took the place of those about texture, as photography became more and more “creative”, as coroborated by research in this field, developed by several Dada artists. The invention of photomontage is one of the best illustrations of this. The questions that it leads one to raise about the status of the image in its artistic unity and the fact that it suggests feasible manipulations of the medium itself are forerunners of a powerful revolution. The practice of photomontage by Raoul Haussmann or John Heartfield – to introduce photography into the political arena – notably prefigures the adventure that the end of the century would qualify as “conceptual photography”. It is the same for the Surrealists, who practised photomontage systematically, allowing them to bring unexpected and hidden visions into view. With this aim of making original images, Man Ray is not unwilling to use refined technical tools, having recourse to the principle of radiography in order to give objects back their integral presence, and Max Ernst multiplies the hybrid compositions that presages one of the prevailing characteristics of contemporary creation. Henceforth, photography, no longer seen as the process of taking a picture with a simple click, wins its artistic dignity, becoming a partner of the “Beaux Arts” alongside architecture, painting and sculpture.
So the accession of photography to the field of plastic arts does not date from yesterday. Even though the idea of “conceptual photography”, no longer dependent on the decisive click, was corollary with the emergence of an attitude proper to the 1970s, it is also simultaneous with a period where the model of photojournalism and a kind of humanism prevail, even endure.
The emergence of new technologies that give rise in their wake as much to the development of the video as to that of IT tools, is quick to influence the practice of photography. This new technology that provides the means of treating an image makes many artists curious as they are impatient to gain new tools for apprising up-to-date aesthetics. In 1980, the exhibition “they call themselves painters, they call themselves photographers”, organised by the art critic, Michel Nuridsany, at the Museum of Modern Art in Paris, thus validated the surprising transformation which photographic art experienced and would go by the name of the “treated image”.
Although the words “treated image” were more explicit with regard to the idea of being treated, being fabricated, the idea of “conceptual photography” was suitable for that transformation in the mid-1980s. The word “conceptual” (rendered “plastecine” in the French) refers to the idea of a photograph whose image is achieved through the different manipulations of the many materials and models that compose the image, as well as of the format or the frame in which the image is created.
The success of this interpretation goes well with a medium that has left the dimensions of the album, except for the frame, and is confronting that of the cyma, of space, even, in order to familiarize itself with the third dimension. In each case, the success resulting from a practice that is no longer the only photographers’ only prerogative, but the nature of artists whom we call by the generic name “conceptual photographers”.
On that account, we witnessed, during the course of time, “a real epistemic rupture as far as nature, status and the function of the photographic medium are concerned” - according to the formula presented by Dominique Baqué, historian of photography and exegete in the same field.
With this adventure and after having mentioned a more realistic and documentary kind of photography, the Month of the Image 2008 in Ho Chi Minh City will aim at highlighting the new type of images that result from this aesthetic revolution, which was coupled with a technological revolution. If photos and videos which are gathered there refer as much to the concepts of appropriation, crossbreeding and hybridization as to a shifting, even poetic vision, of reality, above all they will bear witness to a time and a world undergoing great changes.
Le Mois de l'Image [The Month of The Image] 10/02/2008_10/26/2008
http://www.lemoisdelimage.net/
Presentation by Bertrand Peret. Source:The Month of The Image's exhibition text catalogue.
It has only been around the last thirty years that sound, not in its conventional musical form, but as an artistic material, had been seen as an artistic pratice in its own right. TBG is one of those artists who very naturally added this material to his palette. A multimedia artist in the widest sense of the word, Thierry chooses no one medium over another, but picks according to its functional relevance in the given situation, that is to say according to the physical place and the public present in that space. His work can thus be seen as a result of the situation. An effort of adaptation is required by the public who are to be interviewed, even provoked, their senses being sollicited at times almost violently. Neither the work nor the spectators can content themselves here with being passive. The often minimal and very radical installation is existence in the simplest sense of the word. Mixing up his mediums in such a manner, TBG has finally succeeded in confusing the genres, the exhibition has to be comprehended in a new way almost as a concert. A concert of mediums and meanings, the work is an ensemble that becomes a musical group, in the present case, it would be more like a heavy metal group, that makes you react if not physically, then at least mentally.
BIOGRAPH[ie]Y
Presentation by Bertrand Peret. Source:The Month of The Image's exhibition text catalog.
It has only been around the last thirty years that sound, not in its conventional musical form, but as an artistic material, had been seen as an artistic pratice in its own right. TBG is one of those artists who very naturally added this material to his palette. A multimedia artist in the widest sense of the word, Thierry chooses no one medium over another, but picks according to its functional relevance in the given situation, that is to say according to the physical place and the public present in that space. His work can thus be seen as a result of the situation. An effort of adaptation is required by the public who are to be interviewed, even provoked, their senses being sollicited at times almost violently. Neither the work nor the spectators can content themselves here with being passive. The often minimal and very radical installation is existence in the simplest sense of the word. Mixing up his mediums in such a manner, TBG has finally succeeded in confusing the genres, the exhibition has to be comprehended in a new way almost as a concert. A concert of mediums and meanings, the work is an ensemble that becomes a musical group, in the present case, it would be more like a heavy metal group, that makes you react if not physically, then at least mentally.
BIOGRAPH[ie]Y
THIERRY BERNARD-GOTTELAND
Né-Born en 1974 a Chambéry –F
vit et travaille-lives&works entre/between France & Vietnam.
Education:
Exposition Personnelle/Solo Exhibition:
Selection Exposition Collective/Selected Group Exhibition: